# Carbon dating test meanings, radiocarbon dating

Thus, since this test has been passed, we not only have a partial check on the carbon method, itself, but we have additional proof of the accuracy of tree-ring dating. The radiocarbon dates and tree-ring dates of these other trees agree with those Ferguson got from the bristlecone pine. Actually, carbon dating is not that precise, so a carbon date really corresponds to a small range of tree-ring dates. However, as Weber notes, john bothe dating the carbon dating method bridges these differences.

## Radiocarbon dating

It turns out that such things as rainfall, floods, glacial activity, atmospheric pressure, volcanic activity, and even variations in nearby stream flows show up in the rings. By the way, what does any of this have to do with the age of the earth? Let's look at the equation involved in these growth rate calculations. He said that his work did not establish the super-rapid growth of coral. Ten thousand years might pass before a reef added another foot to its height!

Creationists sometimes seize upon such isolated facts in their desperate bid to discredit tree-ring dating. Our confidence in tree-ring dating is, therefore, established beyond a reasonable doubt. Claims about the magical effects of vapor canopies and tropical living don't impress anyone who has the slightest understanding of the aging process.

If, in fact, the oldest tree is years old, so what? Hovind's year limit on the oldest reefs! More to the point, the patriarchal ages are nothing more than a modified version of an old Babylonian myth! Nor are the bristlecone pines the only plants with a history refuting Noah's flood! The law of averages will take its toll.

Thus, we have plain evidence that at least one reef was much, much older than years or so. The dates in the Bible add up to about years. He discovers that it is headed on a precise course for Earth. He will not achieve his goal with us.

At one point, Ladd had to drill meters almost nine-tenths of a mile! If the earth were really billions of years old, the human population would have gone through the roof! We now have several species of trees whose ring counts agree with each other. What do these figures have to do with actual growth rates?

Their ages are simply a Hebrew version of an older Mesopotamian tradition, which is to say that they are historically fictitious, that they are endowed with symbolic meanings. It is of course true that no one is able to determine the exact length of time which was required for growing such an extensive reef, but it is obvious that it was a very long process. It's like gambling in Las Vegas.

Overlapping tree-rings means a shared environment, and any tree which has grown in both the antediluvian environment and the modern environment is a tree which has survived Noah's flood. It's easy enough to win a couple of hands back to back in a card game, but you can be sure that such a favorable streak won't hold up for long. Fortunately, that is something best explained by creationists. In fact, the case for partially or totally missing rings is much more impressive. Some eastern religions speak of a creation cycle much older than years.

Scientific study has given us reasonable estimates of short term reef growth. If one measures the rate of growth of the tips of these branches he will find it to be up to about mm. As the plant grew outward the interior portions died out, thus leaving a huge ring with each clump becoming a clone of the first growth.

Nobody who has ever studied the population explosion would make such an unwise extrapolation. An ancient, quite naturally, would have assumed that his tribe or city-state began its ascent shortly after the world began. How long that went on is anybody's guess.

It might interest you to know that trees go back at least years without being disturbed by Noah's flood! Thus, we have a spread of dates, to the extent that a date can be applied. Many ancient cultures have stories of an original creation in the recent past.

If that is the case, then it is time for a reality check. We could add disease and excessive activity by pests to that list. What does the age of a coral reef have to do with the age of the earth? These facts show how misguided it is to extrapolate present population trends into the remote past.